Search for: "California Board Sports, Inc. v. Vans, Inc."
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2007, 6:41 pm
” The case cite is California Board Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
(Counterfeit Chic) (LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Steve van Dulken’s blog on patents and IP) TTAB enters summary judgment under section 2(e)(5), cancelling registration for baseball training glove design due to functionality: Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Lexar Media (Patently-O) District Court W D Louisiana: What nunc pro tunc means: Epic Sporting Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
Open Access for All, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Disney Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
Business Intelligence Systems Solutions, Inc. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Spicy IP) Section 3(d) Patents Actand utility model (Spicy IP) The polymorphism of trade mark dilution in India (Spicy IP) Montenegro IP Office of Montenegro functional since 28 May 2008 - term for validation is 28 November 2008 (RelatIP) Nigeria Nigeria textile industry under threat from China fakes (Afro-IP) Norway Use on foreign-language website fails to save Munch mark (Class 46) Poland Polish minister of sport's plans to sell… [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Glassdoor, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
